Billy Ho exposed.
- Thread starter Rukas
- Start date
let me correct your grammatical errors. you seem literary inferior, so i'll help you out there GANGSTA.
you should've said the following:
You're so intelligent. You should be a professor of bullshit along with Rukas.
they must've knocked some screws loose when they gun butted you. get the fuck out of here, guy, lmao.
you should've said the following:
You're so intelligent. You should be a professor of bullshit along with Rukas.
they must've knocked some screws loose when they gun butted you. get the fuck out of here, guy, lmao.
haha i'm not even going to waste my time on you. i don't believe that you were gun butted or stabbed or slashed or whatever. however, it is evident that you were extremely injured. i wish you to a quick recovery. you'll need it with all of the heavy slanging that you've been doing. lol, just tell us the truth man. that's all i want is the truth. what really happened to you?
Blah blah blah, go pick a fight with a cat and leave you webcam on.
Your waist area is not a knife wound at all, AT FUCKING ALL. Like i said, you can see multiple trails, three lines that were done at once, with breaks in them. Knives dont cut like that. Those are scratches from twigs or some shit.
And dude, if your head was SPLIT OPEN, you would be swollen up like a fucking ballon and bruised black and blue.
Your waist area is not a knife wound at all, AT FUCKING ALL. Like i said, you can see multiple trails, three lines that were done at once, with breaks in them. Knives dont cut like that. Those are scratches from twigs or some shit.
And dude, if your head was SPLIT OPEN, you would be swollen up like a fucking ballon and bruised black and blue.
You guys don't realize that medicine and science are highly debatable topics? It is. Rukas made a nice presentation, but if someone wanted to, they could counter-argue his words, but this is not serious enough to bother.
If you read what Billy Ho said, you can see that he made the mistake of using the word "stabbed." That's what Rukas' post is all about: the mistake of Billy Ho saying "stabbed." So what he was not stabbed? That only proves Billy Ho didn't get his wording right.
Other than that, there are some that don't believe Billy Ho, but these are the same people that question all personal stories shared on the Internet. Lets say a real gangbanger came on the Internet. It doesn't matter...just pick someone from real life. Lets say that person came on the Internet and shared his story. Does that mean his story is suddenly not true anymore?
I can't believe that some see the Internet as only a place for certain things. Things have changed. The Game, the dude from Compton who has probably seen dead bodies was issuing threats on the Internet and its not possible that Billy Ho is sharing a true story on the Internet? What's so wrong about someone posting his story on the Internet? I am sure its not something most would do, but then again, Billy Ho does not claim to the the president of the people.
If someone asked for it, I could provide hundreds of circumstances where people have shared real life stories, and sharing it on the Internet does not mean it is any "less true." I know there are liars out there, but that does not make everything a lie "before proven to be the truth."
I am not upset. It only bothers me that people can't think for themselves that much. They require others to do their thinking. Judge Billy Ho on what you've seen, and not what Rukas has seen. I applaud Rukas for his efforts, but even the best of the medical community can be refuted for their views, and so can Rukas.
Billy Ho, scan pictures of court papers, police reports (you said you were arrested), local news articles, or something to verify your story. Its not that I don't believe you. Its that many others don't. Get the neighbor who reported you, if you have to. Just something to get these people to stop accusing you of lying.
If you read what Billy Ho said, you can see that he made the mistake of using the word "stabbed." That's what Rukas' post is all about: the mistake of Billy Ho saying "stabbed." So what he was not stabbed? That only proves Billy Ho didn't get his wording right.
Other than that, there are some that don't believe Billy Ho, but these are the same people that question all personal stories shared on the Internet. Lets say a real gangbanger came on the Internet. It doesn't matter...just pick someone from real life. Lets say that person came on the Internet and shared his story. Does that mean his story is suddenly not true anymore?
I can't believe that some see the Internet as only a place for certain things. Things have changed. The Game, the dude from Compton who has probably seen dead bodies was issuing threats on the Internet and its not possible that Billy Ho is sharing a true story on the Internet? What's so wrong about someone posting his story on the Internet? I am sure its not something most would do, but then again, Billy Ho does not claim to the the president of the people.
If someone asked for it, I could provide hundreds of circumstances where people have shared real life stories, and sharing it on the Internet does not mean it is any "less true." I know there are liars out there, but that does not make everything a lie "before proven to be the truth."
I am not upset. It only bothers me that people can't think for themselves that much. They require others to do their thinking. Judge Billy Ho on what you've seen, and not what Rukas has seen. I applaud Rukas for his efforts, but even the best of the medical community can be refuted for their views, and so can Rukas.
Billy Ho, scan pictures of court papers, police reports (you said you were arrested), local news articles, or something to verify your story. Its not that I don't believe you. Its that many others don't. Get the neighbor who reported you, if you have to. Just something to get these people to stop accusing you of lying.
