Johnny Cochran's Tombstone
- Thread starter PaulyPac
- Start date
If you knew anything about criminal profiling, you'd know its not a science. There's absolutely nothing definite about profiling. One expert will contradict another. It can be reliable at times, but it can also seriously throw off investigators. Take, for example, the sniper shootings in the VA area several years ago.
If you looked at the OJ case with sincere intentions and a thirst for the truth, you may very well see that he's innocent. I can't say he's innocent or guilty, because I am not an expert on the case, but I am not going to become an animal by following what everyone else says.
It is very reasonable to say that OJ is entirely innocent. I say he's innocent because I assume innocence until there's a enough evidence to say otherwise.
Go ahead and live in your world where someone else tells you what to believe. If you're going to believe OJ is guilty, at least believe it out of deep knowledge on the case.
If you looked at the OJ case with sincere intentions and a thirst for the truth, you may very well see that he's innocent. I can't say he's innocent or guilty, because I am not an expert on the case, but I am not going to become an animal by following what everyone else says.
It is very reasonable to say that OJ is entirely innocent. I say he's innocent because I assume innocence until there's a enough evidence to say otherwise.
Go ahead and live in your world where someone else tells you what to believe. If you're going to believe OJ is guilty, at least believe it out of deep knowledge on the case.
Luv4Pac4Ever said:
Preach it Pennypacker! 
I dunno if he's guilty or not. I'd say not guilty as far as he himself committing the murders, I really don't know that he'd be foolish enough to put his own hands on it, but I think he at least knew about it and that it was gonna happen.
I dunno if he's guilty or not. I'd say not guilty as far as he himself committing the murders, I really don't know that he'd be foolish enough to put his own hands on it, but I think he at least knew about it and that it was gonna happen.
Too often we hear "DNA caught him!," "but an expert profiled him!" or some other cliche. Public schools show throw out useless classes and teach people about crimonology so we don't stand in the dark about how reliable all these methods really are.
At one point, I thought DNA was infallible because of everything I heard. Turns out its not nearly as reliable, and the same goes for almost every method of finding a suspect.