COOL- 80% of Stanford students could not find the error

Status
Not open for further replies.

Synful*Luv

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#21
PuffnScruff said:
i would tell you but you were talking behind my back in this thread:fury: :angry:

Grrrrrr :fury: :mad:


I didn't talk about you behind your back technically, I just posted about you before you entered the thread, is that so wrong? :sad:
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#22
Synful*Luv said:
Grrrrrr :fury: :mad:


I didn't talk about you behind your back technically, I just posted about you before you entered the thread, is that so wrong? :sad:
you're also not on my buddy list anymore for some reason:confused: , why did you take me off:sad: , see i have no good reason tell you , you took me off your buddy list
 

Synful*Luv

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#27
PuffnScruff said:
you're also not on my buddy list anymore for some reason:confused: , why did you take me off:sad: , see i have no good reason tell you , you took me off your buddy list

I didn't take you off my buddy list, I luff you :sad: You should still be on there, let me go check.


EDIT: you are on there still. Stop makin excuses :mad:
 

ill-matic

Well-Known Member
#35
EDouble said:
^the fuck u mean it 'doesnt mean theres an error' are u high

lol just cos theres no 0 doesnt mean somethings wrong with it. it's just counting from 1 to 50, why does it have to have a 0 in it? thats like counting from 25-50 and say "thats wrong" because you dont have 1-24. theres nothing missing here cos it doesnt specify that something should be missing
 

EDouble

Will suck off black men for a dime
#36
^i think it specifiys quite clear the point there sumthin missing when it says 'FIND THE ERROR, STANFORD STUDENTS COULDNT MAYBE U WILL!

Regardless if sumbody counted '25-50' i would of bitch slapped them at 27 and sat on a fat 15 2 say i run the bitch errorified or not you have to include ZERO to 24. (not 1 as many mistake)

Therefore the answer is clear ass sunlight
 

lii

New Member
#37
pssh i agree with illmatic. if it had said 'in these digits 0-50...' then there woulda been an error but in this case its just stupid
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#38
I reiterate: there is no error. The reason 80% of Stanford students can't find it because of the stupid concept and the vague instructions.

Whoever thought posting this thread was a good idea in the first place should be, well, shot or something.
 

ill-matic

Well-Known Member
#39
Duke said:
I reiterate: there is no error. The reason 80% of Stanford students can't find it because of the stupid concept and the vague instructions.

Whoever thought posting this thread was a good idea in the first place should be, well, shot or something.

maybe it was just a trick question, and the 80% of those stanford folk were in belief that there had to be something wrong so they possibly just guessed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top