autopsy picture of 2pac (easily offended?, don't click)
- Thread starter Ay-G
- Start date
I've said i won't bitch about posting a picture like that
but i think the picture ain't fake, in the sense that some1 made a tupacpuppet and put some ketchup over it or cutted and pasted from another photo.
This picture is real, it's just not the official autopsy photo.
With a autopsy they have to search for death cause, if u look close they cut the body in the middle and in the place near his lungs, so that was the cause of his death.
but i think the picture ain't fake, in the sense that some1 made a tupacpuppet and put some ketchup over it or cutted and pasted from another photo.
This picture is real, it's just not the official autopsy photo.
With a autopsy they have to search for death cause, if u look close they cut the body in the middle and in the place near his lungs, so that was the cause of his death.
For those people who think it's real.
Just answer me 1 question. Because this is the reason that always makes me think it is fake.
Why is there a white sheet under 2pac? I looked up the correct procedures, and the body is kept on a gurney. So that it is eaily cleanable. Even hollywood gets it right. So why not here?
Just answer me 1 question. Because this is the reason that always makes me think it is fake.
Why is there a white sheet under 2pac? I looked up the correct procedures, and the body is kept on a gurney. So that it is eaily cleanable. Even hollywood gets it right. So why not here?
autopsy picture of 2pac
still don't know why people can say that. it is not possible to see if there is a tattoo or not.
it's the same thing with the video ... everybody said that it's fake cause you don't see the tattoo on his neck. DAMN ... quality was bad as fuck ... nobody could say if there is a tattoo or not. it's stupid to say something like that!
I think he is dead, so I don't care about the pics and vids ... could be real, could be fake ... it doesn't matter
still don't know why people can say that. it is not possible to see if there is a tattoo or not.
it's the same thing with the video ... everybody said that it's fake cause you don't see the tattoo on his neck. DAMN ... quality was bad as fuck ... nobody could say if there is a tattoo or not. it's stupid to say something like that!
I think he is dead, so I don't care about the pics and vids ... could be real, could be fake ... it doesn't matter
i believe it's real. first off, people saying this picture is taken from the cali love video, that's not true. our technology has limitations you know. first of all, you would never get a picture looking that clear from a video, even with one of those digital things that lets you take real good still pictures. in the cali love video, the shot is taken from far away. those familiar with digital photography knows that a photograph or a video frame consists of pixels. you can not, unlike what the movies claim, zoom in on a picture and get a perfectly clear picture. only way to do that is optical zoom. you can use a lense. but using a lense to increase the size of a picture from a video wouldn't work anyway, because like i said, it's built from pixels and you can't zoom in a 400x400-sized area of a picture and make it 800x800 pixels. it is impossible. that strikes out the cali love video theory. photoshopping can do wonders, but it's a reason why yoda looks like a computer game character in the new star wars movie. technically, there are limitations here too. and you can't fake a picture like this. think about shading, saturation, brightness.. it all looks perfect in this picture. if someone faked that they're geniouses and should be doing something else than making fake autopsy pictures.
we have a respected journalist claiming it is real. and as far as the sheet goes on the bed and all that. maybe it was a cheap fucking hospital. or maybe all the beds were taken or their bed was broken and they used a temporary one. in my opinion, that's not grounds for saying the picture is fake. i mean.. you see pac, you see he's dead, you see him all cut up. you think someone did it for fun before they cremated him? if it's not an autopsy picture, i don't know what it is. and i have yet to see hard proof proving it is fake.
and to the people saying that this has been discussed before, follow pittseys example. just because you know doesn't mean the whole world knows :thumb: i think it's an interesting discussion, because assuming someone DID fake this i would be very interested in hearing a reason.
we have a respected journalist claiming it is real. and as far as the sheet goes on the bed and all that. maybe it was a cheap fucking hospital. or maybe all the beds were taken or their bed was broken and they used a temporary one. in my opinion, that's not grounds for saying the picture is fake. i mean.. you see pac, you see he's dead, you see him all cut up. you think someone did it for fun before they cremated him? if it's not an autopsy picture, i don't know what it is. and i have yet to see hard proof proving it is fake.
and to the people saying that this has been discussed before, follow pittseys example. just because you know doesn't mean the whole world knows :thumb: i think it's an interesting discussion, because assuming someone DID fake this i would be very interested in hearing a reason.
My point is that an autopsy patient is not kept on a bed they are kept on a gurney. A gurney does not have a sheet. Why would it need a sheet? There's no possible reason. There were plenty more reasons. But that was the one that stuck in my head.
For anyone that's interested here's an autopsy procedure list - http://www.pathguy.com/autopsy.htm
There's no graphic pics on that page.
However you can click the links. And on each page you will find the patient on a gurney, not on a bed.
For anyone that's interested here's an autopsy procedure list - http://www.pathguy.com/autopsy.htm
There's no graphic pics on that page.
However you can click the links. And on each page you will find the patient on a gurney, not on a bed.
